Showing posts with label Bush administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bush administration. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Bush Administration Gave $43 Million to Taliban: We're So NICE


Man, we give money to everybody. It's like money grows out of printing presses!



May 2001, the US government gave $43 million to the Taliban. I guess it wasn't enough.



Next time, we should give them our entire cache. Then, perhaps, they'll be grateful. Pricks.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Redistributing wealth the Republican way: A new socialism

(Cross-posted at Independent Bloggers' Alliance)

So it seems that the oil men running our country (Bush, Cheney, and Rice!) have had something up their sleeves that we didn't know about: They're all for redistributing wealth. They want your money in their pockets! You see, they're Republican Socialists. Don't ever let them tell you otherwise! They say the proof is in the pudding. Here's the pudding.

The link below takes you to a Washington Post article that tells the story of oil wealth gone wild.

Oil Price Rise Causes Global Shift in Wealth - washingtonpost.com:
In the United States, the rising bill for imported petroleum lowers already anemic consumer savings rates, adds to inflation, worsens the trade deficit, undermines the dollar and makes it more difficult for the Federal Reserve to balance its competing goals of fighting inflation and sustaining growth.
Our dependence on oil has been foisted on us by a government that likes it. From not raising CAFE fuel economy standards since the early '90s to starting a war in an oil-rich nation that could only lead to higher fossil fuel prices -- and threatening another -- we've been duped into giving our money to members of the government rather than the government itself.

Rather than being "handled" by "tax and spend" Democrats, we're being molested by "don't tax but raise our cost of energy and spend more" Repugnicans.

It's time to take our country -- and our money -- back.

The first step: Take them to task for paying for their ill-conceived and carried-out war -- a war -- at least Iraq's reconstruction -- that was to be paid for by Iraq oil revenues! In this sense, we're being taxed twice: Once in terms of tax dollars to pay for the war and a second in terms of higher prices at the pump, at home, in the grocery store, at the hotel, on the plane, and every conceivable place possible.

I'll leave the second step for another day and another post. Rant over.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Monkey girl Condi Rice confronted by protester

And I don't say monkey girl as a diss as a racial slur, rather that she and her Bush cronies act like, and sometimes (okay, always) look like primates of the monkey variety.

Friday, August 24, 2007

What would Jesus spend his money on?


Here's a picture that'll whet your whistle for some good ole warmongering: The US (that's your tax dollars) spends 89% of it's allocation for "national security" on the military (i.e., Iraq) and only 7% on homeland security and 4% on preventive measures.

This is why the Iraq war is such a big deal to the Executive branch: In order to justify spending 89% (or $450 billion) of its national security budget on fighting one little inconsequential Middle Eastern country, it has to make that country seem really bad. For if Iraq weren't so bad, so evil, would you condone spending so much of your money to fight it?

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

WH memo: How to deal with protestors

White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters - washingtonpost.com

Here's a link to the pdf -- http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/freespeech/presidential_advance_manual.pdf

Think you don't live in a country where characteristics of totalitarianism or fascism exist? This sounds like it came right out of the Cold War-era Soviet Union.

The White House has concocted a manual, known as the "Presidential Advance Manual," by which White House staffers can squelch potential protesters using the detailed techniques presented in the manual. The manual has been made available due to a subpoena filed in a case involving the ACLU and two anti-Bush protesters who were thrown in jail for wearing t-shirts that had slogans on them that might hurt Little Bush's feelings.

This kind of stuff is anti-democracy. So, the President proposes spreading democracy throughout the Middle East and world but doesn't really believe in it here. These guys are nothing if not hypocrites, talking out of both sides of their mouths. Gotta love the Repugnicans.

Monday, June 25, 2007

"Supreme" Court (what a crock!!!) rules that faith-based organizations can take all of YOUR money

Supreme Court nixes suit over faith-based plan - Politics - MSNBC.com

I wish these guys and gals could read, for if they could, they might read the Constitution instead of spouting all sorts of imaginary things that it says.

They're just like the religious zealots who quote the bible without reading it. If they did, in fact, read it (are you listening, Curious George?), they'd know that at least half the crap they "believed in" was just that, crap.

Now, the Executive Branch can go on blurring the line between the separation of church and state. Maybe the good old US of A will become just like -- oh, I don't know -- Afghanistan or Iran!

It's this connection between religion and government that's gotten them so far ahead of the curve!

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Gingrich counsels Republicans to steer clear of President Bush

He all but said George Bush is a failure. New Gingrich listed a litany of issues, catastrophes, and calamities that occurred or went poorly under the current Bush administration.

Well, President Bush is not the future. He’s not a solution. He doesn’t solve Social Security. He doesn’t solve Medicare. He doesn’t solve the economy. He doesn’t solve the environment. He doesn’t solve education. He’s a current fact.
Think Progress » Gingrich To Conservatives: Don’t Talk About Iraq, Katrina, Walter Reed, Attorneys, Or Bush

Thursday, May 03, 2007

VA gave biggest bonuses in federal government

Add this to the list of government pigs porking out at the public trough. This is yet another demonstration of Bush's (lack of) leadership of the worse federal government spending spree we have ever seen.

Another demonstration, too, of Bush's not supporting the troops. If he cared for the troops, wouldn't he ensure that they were cared for, rather than turning his head while the VA administrators took large sums of cash while injured soldiers waited for treatment?

VA under fire for hefty employee bonuses - Politics - MSNBC.com

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

White to seek "Lying Czar"

*** SATIRE ***
Specifically, many insiders wonder why an administration that already has advisor Karl Rove and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice would also need a “lying czar.”

On any given day, the Defense Department and the State Department will produce lies that are directly in conflict with each other, and that’s counterproductive,” one insider said. “A ‘lying czar’ would change all that.
The Borowitz Report .com

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Bush vetoes emergency funding bill for military

President George W. (for No Withdrawal, unless it's for birth control purposes) Bush vetoed the emergency funding bill that Congress sent him today.
In only the second veto of his presidency, Bush rejected legislation that would require the first U.S. combat troops to be withdrawn from Iraq by Oct. 1 with a goal of a complete pullout six months later.
It's notable that he's vetoed the bill for a number of reasons. One, he obviously does not support the troops. Two, it's only his second veto. Three, his only other veto was in denying more federal funds earmarked for embryonic stem cell research. Four, this bill was at the President's request; the military desperately needs the money, according to Bush, yet he has just single-handedly prolonged the shortfall.

To sum it all up: Bush hates the military, he hates embryos, and he hates time tables.

Next up: Why Bush hates to read. And it's not because The Pet Goat is what he was reading when the planes struck the WTC.

Bush vetoes emergency funding bill - Yahoo! News

Katrina aid unused or unclaimed

I don't know whether to cry or be angry (probably both are appropriate):
Overall, the United States declined 54 of 77 recorded aid offers from three of its staunchest allies: Canada, Britain and Israel, according to a 40-page State Department table of the offers that had been received as of January 2006.
Most Katrina Aid From Overseas Went Unclaimed - washingtonpost.com

Monday, April 30, 2007

Al Gore will never be president of Canada, ay!

Former Vice President Al Gore has ruined any chance of becoming President of Canada, most likely because there is no President of Canada, but more importantly, because he's pissed off Canada's current leadership, Bush-lite.

Gore Calls Canada Climate Plan a 'Fraud' - washingtonpost.com

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Condoleeza Rice subpoenaed by Congress

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Henry Waxmax, has subpoenaed Secretary of State Rice in order to ask her questions about the long-dispelled claim that Saddam Hussein attempted to buy enriched uranium from Niger.

Rice didn't take too kindly to the subpoena, indicating that she may not comply with it since "I addressed these questions, almost the same questions, during my confirmation hearing. This is an issue that has been answered and answered and answered."

She says she will answer the questions in a letter but not in person. There must be a reason. If she really thought that the questions had been answered. Furthermore, she's hiding behind executive privilege, the concept that presidential advisers cannot be forced to testify before Congress.

If all this is true, then why is she bothering to answer the questions in a letter? Why not just say "No."

I think it's just one more pissing match that Congress and the Bush administration are so apt to engage in. It's sad that our government is so broken that it has come to this.

Congress should have asserted its power while these things were going on, not 4 years later. Too bad nobody in Congress had the fortitude to do the right thing at the right time.

Rice signals rejection of House subpoena - Yahoo! News

Monday, April 23, 2007

Bush Administration awash in scandals? No, really?

The most amazing thing about this article is that it only takes one page.

Bush Administration Awash in Scandals - Forbes.com

Thursday, April 12, 2007

UPDATED: Oh boy, White House at it again -- "Countless" emails purged, gone forever

UPDATE: The more I think about this, the more I get pissed off about it. Bush can look at my emails but I can't look at his? Is this the epitome of hypocrisy? I'm thinking there's a way to force the government into "finding" all those "lost" emails.

Are you still doubting that the Bush administration has something to hide? Still skeptical about the skeptics? How 'bout this one:

Let's delete thousands of emails and see if anybody notices. Let's get rid of the evidence before Congress can investigate us.

It's high time the Justice Administration investigate the White House. Bring in some computer forensics experts and bring all those "lost" emails back.

Oh, wait a minute! The Justice Department is not independent of the White House! In fact, it's the Justice Department that is under investigation!! In fact, Bush and his buddy, "Alberto" Gonzales are figuratively, if not actually, in bed together on many a scandal.

What the hell was I thinking? Justice Department should investigate...(shaking my head in disgust at my own naiveté).

Dan Froomkin - Countless White House E-Mails Deleted - washingtonpost.com

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Stonewalling Bush

It seems as though our president has taken stonewalling to a new high (or low, as the case may be). There's nothing that comes out of this administration that is, in the words of the president, "transparent." Everything is cloaked in secrecy, on a need-to-know basis.

I, for one, am sick and tired of this administration's skirting the law, flouting its power, and forestalling any and all oversight. Tony Snow said that the Congress had no constitutional right to oversight of the Executive branch. I'm no constitutional scholar, but I think Congress has a bitch here. Seems to me that the founding fathers, so often cited as if they're gods by this administration, intended that there by (grade school civics don't fail me now)...checks and balances.

Our whole government is predicated on this concept of checks and balances: No one branch can impose its will or bully its way into doing something. But President Bush and "Alberto" disagree. They believe that George indeed should be King.

The linked story is just one of many examples of how this administration stonewalls its overseers.

Subpoenas issued in fired prosecutors probe - Politics - MSNBC.com