Hillary Clinton has taken off the gloves, calling Barack Obama naive, inexperienced, and striving for the Presidency since birth (her campaign sleuths have dug up a paper from Obama's long-ago past: An essay little Barack wrote in kindergarten entitled "I Want to Be President").
Silly former First Lady.
The question I have is how does Hillary say with a straight face that she's experienced? Number one, how is she materially more experienced than John Edwards or Barack Obama? She's been a Senator, what, 7 years? Obama 4? Big difference. Woopty-doo.
Name an accomplishment she's made while Senator from New York...any of her bills signed into law, any leadership positions of committees where something -- hell, anything -- substantial has arisen?
And what did she do in the White House? Stand by her man? Try to socialize health care and failing miserably so?
Let's get one thing straight: Intellectually, I am sure she's smarter than the average bear, even smarter than really smart bears. She can probably go toe-to-toe with her genius husband, Bill. I'd love to sit in on some of their conversations. I'd probably have to just sit there and act like I got it when I clearly didn't get it.
Her new strategy of attacking her opponents, coupled with her old strategy of fabricating her credentials, is going to backfire on her.
When is somebody going to ask her the simple question: What makes you more qualified than anybody else?
Additionally, she's going to have to choose -- most likely -- one of her opponents that she's beat up as her running mate if she wins the Dem's nomination.
Are we then to forget how stupid and inexperienced they are?
Will Clinton's Obama Attacks Backfire? - TIME
Hillary Attacks
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment